Novel use of dynamic MR hydrography to rule out esophageal perforation post atrial fibrillation ablation in a patient with anaphylaxis to gadolinium.

Esophageal thermal injury is one of the most devastating complications of atrial radiofrequency ablation, and its diagnosis can be challenging. In this report, we highlight the novel use of free water as a contrast material to better visualize the esophageal lumen in a patient with anaphylaxis to Iodinated contrast media and Gadolinium who recently underwent atrial fibrillation ablation. This becomes particularly handy in patients with contrast allergy, and further emphasizes the role of multimodality imaging.

Endoscopic self-expandable metal stent versus endoscopy vacuum therapy for traumatic esophageal perforations: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic esophageal perforations (TEP) are a grave medical condition and require immediate intervention. Techniques such as Esophageal Self-Expandable Metal Stent (E-SEMS) and Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy (EVT) show promise in reducing tissue damage and controlling esophageal leakage. The present study aims to compare the application of EVT to E-SEMS placement in TEP. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study valuated 30 patients with TEP. The E-SEMS and EVT groups were assessed for time of hospitalization, treatment duration, costs, and clinical outcome. RESULTS: Patients treated with EVT (24.4 ± 13.2) demonstrated significantly shorter treatment duration (p < 0.005) compared to the group treated with E-SEMS (45.8 ± 12.9) and patients submitted to E-SEMS demonstrated a significant reduction (p = 0.02) in the time of hospitalization compared to the EVT (34 ± 2 vs 82 ± 5 days). Both groups demonstrated a satisfactory discharge rate (E-SEMS 93.7% vs EVT 71.4%) but did not show statistically significant difference (p = 0.3155). E-SEMS treatment had a lower mean cost than EVT (p < 0.05). Descriptive statistics were utilized, arranged in table form, where frequencies, percentages, mean, median, and standard deviation of the study variables were calculated and counted. The Fisher's Exact Test was used to evaluate the relationship between two categorical variables. To evaluate differences between means and central points, the parametric t-test was utilized. Comparisons with p value up to 0.05 were considered significant. CONCLUSION: E-SEMS showed a shorter time of hospitalization, but a longer duration of treatment compared to EVT. The placement of E-SEMS and EVT had the same clinical outcome. Treatment with E-SEMS had a lower cost compared with EVT.

Esophageal Perforation Presenting Initially as Multiple Brain Abscesses Secondary to Streptococcus intermedius.

Brain abscess is a life-threatening infection that can occur secondary to contiguous or hematogenous spread. Several underlying conditions can lead to brain abscesses, such as dental infection, otitis media, sinusitis, and immunosuppression. Esophageal perforation leading to brain abscesses is extremely rare. We report a rare case of a 32-year-old man who presented to the emergency department with progressive headaches and upper-extremity weakness. Upon further evaluation, computed tomography (CT) revealed multiple brain abscesses secondary to Streptococcus intermedius infection. The patient eventually underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), which showed a perforation in the middle third of the esophagus. This case highlights the importance of considering esophageal perforation as a predisposing condition for brain abscesses.

Asymptomatic esophageal perforation discovered after elective cardiac surgery: the importance of clinical awareness.

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has become an indispensable part of cardiothoracic surgery at present and is considered to be a safe procedure, rarely associated with complications. However, TEE may cause serious and life threatening complications, as presented in this case report. We describe a patient who developed an empyema after elective cardiac surgery due to an esophageal perforation caused by TEE, without any clinical symptoms. Risk factors for TEE-related complications, identified in recent literature, will be discussed as well as the remarkable absence of clinical symptoms in this particular patient.

[Endoscopic vacuum therapy in minimally invasive treatment of esophageal perforations]. / Effektivnost' endoskopicheskoi vakuumnoi terapii v kompleksnom minimal'no invazivnom lechenii perforatsii pishchevoda.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) and open surgery for esophageal perforations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 60 patients with esophageal perforations between 2010 and 2022. The main group included 29 patients who underwent minimally invasive treatment with EVT, the control group - 31 patients after open surgical interventions. RESULTS: Pneumonia occurred in 21 (72%) and 14 (45%) patients (p=0.04), esophageal stenosis within the perforation zone - in 4 (13.8%) and 1 (3.2%) patient, respectively (p=0.188). Chronic esophageal fistulas were significantly more common in the control group (6 (20.7%) versus 15 (48.4%) patients, p=0.032). The overall duration of treatment (median) among survivors was significantly shorter in the main group: 33 (23; 48) versus 71.5 (59; 93.7) days (p=0.5). However, length of ICU-stay was slightly higher (11 (6; 16) versus 8.5 (5; 12.75) days, p=0.32). Mortality rate was 13.8% (n=4) and 29% (n=9), respectively (p=0.213). Minimally invasive technologies decreased the risk of fatal outcome by 10 times (OR 10.123, 95% CI 1.491-124.97, p=0.035) compared to traditional surgery. CONCLUSION: EVT in complex minimally invasive treatment of patients with mechanical esophageal injuries is an effective method significantly reducing mortality and duration of inpatient treatment compared to traditional surgical approach.

Robotic surgery in the management of synchronous esophageal and gastric perforation after endoscopic dilation.

Upper gastrointestinal perforation is a feared complication of diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy, with an incidence of perforation between 0.3% and 5%. Even though is rare, the mortality rate can be as high as 40%. Currently, there is no consensus on the best therapeutic strategy and it usually depends on patient stability, the extent of perforation, time to diagnosis, surgeon experience and available resourcesWe present a case of a patient who presented to our institution to undergo an ambulatory oesophageal dilation. After dilation, the patient developed two full-thickness gastric perforations and a full-thickness oesophageal perforation without haemodynamic instability. All perforations were diagnosed and treated with a combination of intraoperative endoscopy and robotic surgery with excellent outcomes.We demonstrate that a robotic approach combined with intraoperative diagnostic endoscopy is a safe and feasible treatment option for esophageal and gastric perforations in a stable patient without large extraluminal contamination.

Not Your Typical Sore Throat-A Case Report on Delayed Complications From Cervical Spinal Surgery.

Esophageal perforation is an uncommon illness with a mortality rate as high as 50%. It is most frequently caused by iatrogenic instrumentation for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Noniatrogenic spontaneous ruptures account for 15% of cases, followed by traumatic injury and rupture secondary to a foreign body.1 Sore throat is a common emergency medicine complaint with an array of causes and severity of pathology. We report a case of a sore throat resulting from esophageal perforation and prevertebral abscess as delayed complications from an anterior cervical surgery.

Replogle Modified Endoscopic Vacuum-Assisted Closure (EVAC) Therapy: A New Strategy to Treat Anastomotic Leakage and Esophageal Perforation.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage (AL) and esophageal perforation are life-threatening complications following surgery or endoscopic dilations. "Replogle modified EVAC therapy" consists of placing a Replogle tube directly into the lumen or within an abscess cavity and remove by suction all intra-cavity fluids and secretion with a continuous low-pressure suction, promoting granulation tissue proliferation, thereby gradually decreasing the cavity size. The aim of our study was to evaluate the technical feasibility, safety, and efficacy of this technique in pediatric patients. METHODS: A retrospective review charts of consecutive pediatric patients that were treated with "Replogle modified EVAC therapy" at our pediatric referral center between 2013 and 2022 was conducted. The clinical, endoscopic, radiological, and surgical information and data of patients were collected and revised as well as their follow-up and outcomes. RESULTS: Ten patients (6/10 male; mean age: 7.8 y.o., range: 1.1-18 y.o.) were treated using the "Replogle modified EVAC therapy". Four out of ten patients developed esophageal perforations after endoscopic procedures. Six out of the ten enrolled patients had AL complications after surgical operations. All patients were successfully treated. There were no technical failures or complications with device placement. Mean treatment duration was 16 days (range 7-41 days). No additional treatment was needed for complete leak resolution. CONCLUSIONS: "Replogle modified EVAC therapy" represents a promising and mini-invasive method to treat esophageal perforations and post-surgical leak in the paediatric age group. In our experience, the use of this technique was safe, effective, and particularly well suited also in complex paediatric patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Transgastric drainage of the perforated esophagus: our experiences over 10 years.

We first described the technique of transgastric drainage of esophageal injuries in 2008. The method establishes vacuum drainage of the lumen of the esophagus, while maintaining patency, effectively exteriorizing the perforation to allow healing. We summarize this technique and present our experiences from the largest published series of patients. Our unit has treated selected esophageal injuries with transgastric drainage for 10 years. Indications include perforations not amenable to primary repair and treatment failure following prior surgical intervention. A 36 French silastic chest drain is pulled through the abdominal and stomach wall and introduced into the esophagus so that it crosses the perforation. Gastropexy is performed. Mediastinal decontamination and drainage are performed as needed. Continuous suction of -10 cm water is applied. Leak resolution is assessed with weekly water-soluble swallows. For this retrospective observational study, we analyzed data for patients with esophageal perforation, between 2012 and 2022. Inpatient mortality and time to leak resolution were set as primary and secondary outcomes. Esophageal perforations were treated with transgastric drain in 35 patients, of whom 68% (n = 24) were men. Median age was 67 (26-84). Spontaneous perforations accounted for 60% (n = 21), 31% (n = 11) were iatrogenic and 6% (n = 2) were ischemic. Inpatient and 30-day mortality was 14% (n = 5). Among successful treatments, the median length to resolution of leak on imaging was 34.5 days (6-80). Transgastric drainage can successfully treat esophageal perforations, where primary repair is not feasible. The mortality rate of 14% and reduced morbidity compares favorably with other traditional methods of management for esophageal perforation.

Successful Treatment of Fishbone-Induced Esophageal Perforation and Mediastinal Abscess: A Case Report and Literature Review.

BACKGROUND Fish bone ingestion is the most common cause of esophageal perforation (12%). However, it rarely causes esophageal perforation and mediastinal abscess. Most studies recommend surgical intervention for patients with esophageal perforation and thoracic abscess. However, surgery may not be suitable for extremely critical cases or may have limited effectiveness. In such cases, a combination of surgery and conservative treatment is crucial. The use of double cannula irrigation and drainage in conservative treatment has shown promising results in pus removal. CASE REPORT We report a 28-year-old man with a perforated esophagus with abscess and mediastinal abscess due to fish bone. Emergency surgery was performed after admission. Symptoms of septic shock developed after surgery, and a significant amount of pus was still present in the chest cavity and mediastinum. Conservative treatment was adopted, with double cannula irrigation and drainage. By employing anti-infection measures and continuous irrigation and drainage, the patient was cured after 42 days. CONCLUSIONS In this case, surgical intervention did not yield satisfactory results. However, after using double cannula irrigation and drainage to clear the thoracic and mediastinal abscesses, the patient's infection levels returned to normal. Additionally, the patient was successfully weaned off the ventilator, and the tracheotomy catheter was removed. After discharge, the patient resumed to normal life, without any significant complications during 1 year of follow-up. Double cannula drainage played a vital role in this patient's treatment; however, further clinical evidence is required to determine its suitability for other patients with esophageal perforation complicated by mediastinal abscess.

Endoscopic iatrogenic esophageal perforation and management: a retrospective outcome analysis in the modern era.

INTRODUCTION: Iatrogenic esophageal perforation (IEP) is a severe adverse event (AE) of upper endoscopy procedures (UEPs) associated with morbidity. Management has shifted from surgery to endotherapy with clip closure (CC), self-expanding metal stent (SEMS), and vacuum therapy (VT). Limited analyses measure outcomes during contemporary interventional endoscopy periods. METHODS: IEPs associated with EGD, upper EUS, small bowel enteroscopy (SBE), and ERCP at a 3-hospital academic center from January 2011 to December 2023 were identified retrospectively from a centralized AE database. Additional information was obtained from medical records. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel and STATA. RESULTS: Thirty-two IEPs from 26 EGDs, 4 EUS, 1 SBE, and 1 ERCP were identified. IEPs occurred mostly after dilation (bougie N = 7; balloon, N = 5) or foreign body removal (N = 6). Most IEPs occurred in the lower esophagus (N = 10) or gastroesophageal junction (N = 8). Diagnosis was made at a median 2 h after the injury by endoscopy (N = 14), CT scan (N = 12), esophagram (N = 5), or x-ray (N = 1). Initial treatment included conservative therapy alone (N = 7), CC (N = 3), SEMS (N = 14), SEMS plus CC (N = 3), or surgery (N = 3). Eleven patients required additional treatment including repeat SEMS or adjustment (N = 4) or VT (N = 1). No surgical interventions were required after 2013. The median hospital stay was 3 days. Disposition included discharge to home (N = 25), long-term care facility (N = 2), 4 deaths (12.5% of IEPs), and 1 unknown. CONCLUSIONS: IEPs are rare and occur throughout the esophagus after any UEP. The majority are recognized immediately and managed with endotherapy, or rarely, surgery today. These characteristics likely explain the low mortality in this study.

[Diagnosis and treatment of traumatic esophageal perforation.] / A traumás nyelocso-perforáció diagnosztikája, kezelési stratégiája egy konzervatívan sikeresen kezelt eset kapcsán.

Traumatic esophageal injuries are extremely rare and challenging both from a diagnostic and therapeutic point of view. As regards one of their patients, the authors review the etiology and the pathophysiology of esophageal perforations. They present the case of a 36-year-old patient with a penetrating chest trauma. During an acute surgery, the foreign body was removed from the mediastinum, but in the early postoperative period, an oesophageal rupture was recognized. After conservative management, the patient was discharged from the hospital without any complications 82 days after the injury. Considering that the traumatic esophageal rupture is rare and the mortality of these patients is very high, it is important to make a good decision in time. The authors would like to highlight that even in the case of severe penetrating esophageal injury, the right therapeutical decision can lead to complete recovery. Orv Hetil. 2023; 164(43): 1719-1724.

Outcomes Associated With Esophageal Perforation Management: Results From a French Nationwide Population-based Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outcomes associated with esophageal perforation (EP) management at a national level and determine predictive factors of 90-day mortality (90dM), failure-to-rescue (FTR), and major morbidity (MM, Clavien-Dindo 3-4). BACKGROUND: EP remains a challenging clinical emergency. Previous population-based studies showed rates of 90dM up to 38.8% but were outdated or small-sized. METHODS: Data from patients admitted to hospitals with EP were extracted from the French medico-administrative database (2012-2021). Etiology, management strategies, and short and long-term outcomes were analyzed. A cutoff value of the annual EP management caseload affecting FTR was determined using the "Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detector" method. Random effects logistic regression model was performed to assess independent predictors of 90dM, FTR, and MM. RESULTS: Among 4765 patients with EP, 90dM and FTR rates were 28.0% and 19.4%, respectively. Both remained stable during the study period. EP was spontaneous in 68.2%, due to esophageal cancer in 19.7%, iatrogenic postendoscopy in 7.3%, and due to foreign body ingestion in 4.7%. Primary management consisted of surgery (n = 1447,30.4%), endoscopy (n = 590,12.4%), isolated drainage (n = 336,7.0%), and conservative management (n = 2392,50.2%). After multivariate analysis, besides age and comorbidity, esophageal cancer was predictive of both 90dM and FTR. An annual threshold of ≥8 EP managed annually was associated with a reduced 90dM and FTR rate. In France, only some university hospitals fulfilled this condition. Furthermore, primary surgery was associated with a lower 90dDM and FTR rate despite an increase in MM. CONCLUSIONS: We provide evidence for the referral of EP to high-volume centers with multidisciplinary expertise. Surgery remains an effective treatment for EP.

Esophageal perforation etiology, outcome, and the role of surgical management - an 18-year experience of surgical cases in a referral center.

INTRODUCTION: Esophageal perforation is a surgical emergency with a high rate of morbidity and mortality. Its poor prognosis is mainly associated with previous patient-specific comorbidities and a lack of timely diagnosis and treatment. The objective of this study was to investigate the etiological factors and different surgical methods of treatment with consideration of mortality rate and comorbidities. METHOD: The present cross-sectional study was conducted on patients who underwent surgical intervention due to esophageal injury from 2002 to 2019 (18 years). Demographic and clinical characteristics along with performed surgical interventions were evaluated accordingly. RESULTS: In this study, 69 patients with a mean age of 38.8 years were evaluated, of which 45 (65.2%) cases were men. In terms of location of the perforation, the thoracic portion of the esophagus followed by the cervical and abdominal esophagus were more frequently injured with a rate of 32 (46.4%), 30 (43.5%), and 19 (27.5%) cases, respectively. Accordingly, foreign body ingestion followed by penetrating injuries were the most common causative agents leading to esophageal perforation. CONCLUSION: Obtaining the desired results from the treatment of this condition depends on factors such as patients' previous comorbidities, cause of the rupture, the location of the esophageal damage, and delay in the start of treatment. Since there is no single gold standard treatment strategy, each patient should be individually evaluated.